Home  About  Words  Archive  Photography  Links  Surf and Weather 

  Go Backward in Time » »

Writing About Photography Law

Just finished a top to bottom update of my 2006 article on Personal Photography and Personal Websites.  Even though there were shiny new cases and a few longer citations there hasn’t been much new to the civil issues arising from Civil Code § 3344, but I felt it was time to reference the criminal issues arising from sharing naughty pictures after promising not to (Penal Code § 647) after reading a few poorly written summaries in the mainstream media in their New Year’s new law roundup clickbait articles.  And no, naughty pictures is not the term of art, but I’ll leave the quotes of the legislature’s explicit list to the article and the code itself.

Now that the updates are finished, maybe I can get back to actually doing some photography, or even practicing billable law.

Chuck posted this on Wednesday, January 14, 2015 at  8:53 am.   No comments yet. Be the first. 

California’s State

Just read the scary press release on California’s Judicial Council decision to stop their planned new case management system.  No budget means no new system – I can understand that, and look disapprovingly at what passes for a legislature in modern California.  The courts are tied to the same process that funds education, and being married to a teacher I understand the stresses there too.  I’ve no illusions that any aspect of state-funded government in California is in any better shape these days.  It does leave open the question though of what the courts are going to do without their precious new case management system.  My unfortunate experience is that San Diego County courts are already in the position where documents regularly don’t make it to the correct files,.

Besides talk of salvaging bits of a system that they can no longer afford to buy, it would be nice to hear if someone has some kind of plans to get the administrative side of the state courts actually functioning again, even if it has to be with paper files and the suction tubes running documents around the building.

Chuck posted this on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 at  6:19 pm.   Comments Off on California’s State 

Jury Duty Flashback

When I had jury duty at the end of 2009, my post here didn’t mention much about the prosecutor.  He presented a competent case, but the drama was all in the  defendant.  There were a couple of time where the DA lost his cool, but given the tenor of the trial it was understandable even if it was a bit over the top.  Parts of it where also what I remember as junior DA theatrics, or maybe the legal equivalent of spiking the ball after a good play, but again, let’s remember he was playing against a mentally ill self-represented defendant.  It came across like an NFL player spiking the ball after a good play against a Pop Warner team: poor sportsmanship, but nothing more.

The name struck a bell when I saw this article today though highlighting the prosecuting attorney’s conduct in another prosecution: Irrelevant and potentially inflammatory questioning and a pattern of misconduct that rendered the trial fundamentally unfair, at least according the the Fourth District Court of Appeal. Unfortunately I’m not surprised at all.

Chuck posted this on Wednesday, January 19, 2011 at  4:47 pm.   Comments Off on Jury Duty Flashback 

Free Horton!

Great piece by Duke’s Center for the Study of the Public Domain about all the great works that we, the public, would now have free access to if Congress hadn’t extended copyright protections in 1976.  While there are certainly some good reasons for copyright protection, I think the article gives a great illustration of how ‘life plus 70 years’ may be a little extreme, and what the public domain is missing out on, and will continue to miss out on until 2050.

Chuck posted this on Saturday, January 8, 2011 at  9:23 am.   Make the second comment. 

First Amendment Friday

Just doing a little shout-out for the First Amendment and the federal judiciary here today.  Many of the amendments *coughFourthcough* *coughFifthcough* have been battered in recent years, but the First still comes through strong.  Yes, being able to say whether you’re gay (or not) is speech.  Yes, being able to write or draw something on your skin is speech.  Maybe I’m just amazed that either of these issues needed to be litigated at all.

Chuck posted this on Friday, September 10, 2010 at  8:10 am.   Comments Off on First Amendment Friday 

Quickie Weddings

Interesting post at Joe.My.God on preparations in some quarters for quick rushes to the altar should a gap come between stays in the appellate process for Perry v. Schwarzenegger.

I know people who’ve planned their weddings for years.  We took a month (and then four more for the reception).  Strange to now be thinking about windows of opportunity for couples lasting only hours or days.  Stranger still is that I keep flashing to the titular scene in The Great Escape, and wondering how many more we can get through the tunnel before the goons catch on.

Chuck posted this on Wednesday, August 11, 2010 at  3:14 pm.   Comments Off on Quickie Weddings 

Sad For The Future

I haven’t made much of a secret of my humble opinion that the California courts are seriously broken.  Their infrastructure, particularly that for handling information, is at least 20 years behind the times.  Instead of expanding to deal with the consequences of the recession, they cut back with a resulting slow-down in the handling of cases across the board.

The issue is compounded by a certain class of cases that will never, ever, end, taking resources forever.  Yesterday while waiting (two hours to make a five minute appearance) for a case to be called, I watched the child support case of an elderly man where the state was still pursuing $164,000 in arrears for a child who is now 33 years old.  The man was arguing his monthly payments should be reduced to $50 per month because he had just lost his job.  The result of the day’s work on that case was squat nada bupkus because a continuance had to be granted because a party had only received certain documents 24 days before the hearing instead of the required 30.  The court will take up the issue again in August.

NB: the interest alone on $164,000 of past due child support is $1366 per month.  If his motion is granted, he will still only be paying 3 1/2% of the interest accruing each month, and never touching the principal.

I admit I don’t know what the solution should be in cases like this.  I suspect it took a lot of neglect to rack up that much in arrears.  Massive neglect, even intentional wrongdoing, doesn’t stop the government from bailing out banks, or automakers or reckless homeowners though, so maybe I should stop feeling judgmental about how the debt was created.  I just hate seeing cases (or problems, or debts, take your pick)  that by plan and inflexible laws can never end, and in the process eat up dwindling, finite, resources and judicial time.

Chuck posted this on Wednesday, June 23, 2010 at  8:00 am.   2 comments have been made. Join them. 

Legal Education

Ignoring for the moment the substance of a certain new Supreme Court decision issued this morning, I’m going to be talking law to Spinner’s 5th graders tomorrow, and wondering if I should try to make them Venn diagram this:

KENNEDY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS,
C. J., and SCALIA and ALITO, JJ., joined, in which THOMAS, J., joined as to all but Part IV, and in which STEVENS, GINSBURG, BREYER, and SO-TOMAYOR, JJ., joined as to Part IV. ROBERTS, C. J., filed a concurring opinion, in which ALITO, J., joined. SCALIA, J., filed a concurring opin-ion, in which ALITO, J., joined, and in which THOMAS, J., joined in part. STEVENS, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part,in which GINSBURG, BREYER, and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined. THOMAS, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I’m taking the ‘scared straight’ approach to their exposure to the world of law. Just say no, kiddies.

Chuck posted this on Thursday, January 21, 2010 at  8:36 am.   Comments Off on Legal Education 

The Path To Recovery?

The San Diego Superior Court will close all courtrooms and business offices on Wednesday, September 16, 2009 as well as the third Wednesday of each subsequent month through June 2010.

The California Judicial Council approved the unprecedented one-day-a-month closures for all state courts due to the ongoing statewide financial crisis and the Legislature’s reduced state funding to the courts.

Because, yes, this state is that messed up.   This is on top of San Diego already closing the clerk’s office to the public at 3:30 every afternoon.  Anyone care to remind me of any states where the California Bar has reciprocity for practice?  It would be nice if they coincided with states that recognized my marriage.

Chuck posted this on Monday, September 14, 2009 at  7:38 am.   Comments Off on The Path To Recovery? 

Disconnected Thoughts

Not really proscrastinating, just trying to avoid overthinking a hearing this afternoon.  Need to keep things focussed and on point. I’d sneak out for a swim, but the tendons in my wrist seem to have gotten mangled (again) over the last week, and I’m trying to be good until BorgHealth can do some probes and give me some magic pills on Monday.  Good equals bored though.   Not only does the swimming keep me from becoming Jabba the Chuck, but it keeps me sane.  Need to be doing something away from the electronic leashes, and the swimming cuts off the links for a while.  That’s a good thing.

Chuck posted this on Thursday, January 22, 2009 at  10:23 am.   Comments Off on Disconnected Thoughts 

  Go Backward in Time » »

Recent Comments

Chuck wrote "The shameless shilling worked. I now have a $25 gift card for dining in Tahoe that I need to use or regift by the end of the..."

Chuck wrote "Stuck isn’t his issue. His issue is being so skinny (absent the fluf) that the railing is just a guideline and..."

Darren wrote "I hope he isn’t stuck in the railing."

Chuck wrote "Total of four photos from today in the gallery."

spinnerdude wrote "He bites and licks toes! Take him back! 😉"

Beachy Vistas

Cal Mens Novice crew: The crew rows for a win in their Saturday prelim for the Derek Guelker Memorial Cup. They went on to win the cup in the Grand Finale Sunday.

Recent Tweets

Recent Beachlaw Posts

Vacation Rentals as Coastal Access? - Posted 3 years ago

Not Dead Yet - Posted 3 years ago

Beach Use Narrows - Posted 4 years ago

Search The Blog

Top 30 Tags

Blogs Being Stalked

17th Man

A Life in the Day

ArtLung

Athletic Foodie

Chrisafer

Critical MAS

Crowd Sorcerer

Drum Major Kev

How Appealing

Ironic Sans

Jeffrey Ricker

Jimbo

Kenneth in the (212)

Kottke

Leahpeah

Legal Moose

Life Serial

Mikerzz

New Velvet Mafia

Osten Family Blog

Phil's Vegas Blog

Photojunkie

Spinnerdude

Thomas Locke Hobbs

Urban Bohemian

What Some Would Call Lies

WWdN


More Linkage Inside


Buttons and Badges